From: jens m. n. <no...@we...> - 2005-06-01 21:43:39
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, It was me, bringing up the locking issue again by asking Franco Broi for FUSE locking support... David Schwartz wrote: >> All the locking for a FUSE filesystem is handled in the kernel, >> lock commands don"t get passed down to the application. > > Which is, of course, useless since the kernel can"t actually lock > the files. Because the files being locked may not be accessible by the kernel? I dont't think that this must be useless, because the fuse filesystem can handle the lock request. What is currently done when a process uses a flock() or fcntl() within a fuse filesystem? -> return "???"; :-) Greetings, Jens - -- jens m. noedler no...@we... pgp: 0x9f0920bb http://noedler.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCniwKBoFc9p8JILsRAnKxAJ4zDqGmXQwk3TGGddhzWfp/RM+EZgCeN8Dq 2RwaS1rIeoixqMS1+lNImTA= =9KZH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |