From: Dan Polansky <dan.polansky@gm...>  20080302 11:00:05

Dear Dimitry, so my conjectural explanation was correct, as you write that Chris has already used tag beta 17. I do not see how I was supposed to extract this information from your initial email. It seems that your email has mainly been addressed to Chris. If this indeed were so, starting the email with "Hello Chris", "Dear Chris" or anything of the sort would make it clear that the email possibly provides insufficient context for other people than Chris. If however the email was addressed to anyone one the list, then providing sufficient context, by relating the fact that Chris has already started tagging some files with beta 17, would be in order. Best regards, Dan On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Dimitry Polivaev <dpolivaev@...> wrote: > > What has this to do with letting people know that beta 16 has not yet > > been published? And the subject title is "New beta version can be tagged > > Beta 16". > > > > Given the last beta has had the number 15, is that any surprise that the > > next should be called beta 16? > > Chris has submitted files to CVS where he has already mentioned Beta 17. > You can look at list "Freemindcvslog" for more details (source forge > login is required to see it). > > 