Re: [Freemind-developer] [Fwd: [freemind - Complaints from users] Licensing problems]

[Dimitry P. <dpo...@gm...>]

> Oh!  My mistake, the plugins/latex/Readme.txt is actually gpl v3 not lppl.
> But that causes a similar problem in that all of the MPL 1.1 files are 
> not gpl v3 compliant in any way, even if the appropriate forms have been 
> filed for gpl v2 compliance.

And our SVG - Plugin requires batik which has Apache License, Version 
2.0. It is not compatible with the pure GPL 2 .

Further I would like to notice that the MPL 1.1 licensed files do not 
contain a java code. The xslt files are interpreted for performing the 
xslt transformation. The js - file is just extracted to the output 
directory during the transformation. They are contained in the jar files 
but they are not linked with the GPL code. So I am not sure if there is 
a problem.

Dimitry