From: Suman M. <man...@gm...> - 2009-11-12 07:29:03
|
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 06:11 +0200, Debarshi Ray wrote: > When configured as '--disable-static --enable-reentrant > --with-backtrace', 'make check' failed with the following on my Fedora > 11 system. > > America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires: day 290: first failed: libc 2009-10-18 > 12:00:00 dst 0 != libical 2009-10-18 13:00:00 dst 1 > America/Argentina/Cordoba: day 290: first failed: libc 2009-10-18 > 12:00:00 dst 0 != libical 2009-10-18 13:00:00 dst 1 > America/Argentina/Tucuman: day 290: first failed: libc 2009-10-18 > 12:00:00 dst 0 != libical 2009-10-18 13:00:00 dst 1 > America/Argentina/San_Luis: day 000: first failed: libc 2009-01-01 > 12:00:00 dst 0 != libical 2009-01-01 11:00:00 dst 0 > America/Argentina/San_Luis: day 018: okay again: libc 2009-01-19 12:00:00 dst 0 > Australia/Perth: day 297: first failed: libc 2009-10-25 12:00:00 dst 0 > != libical 2009-10-25 13:00:00 dst 1 > Australia/Eucla: day 297: first failed: libc 2009-10-25 12:00:00 dst 0 > != libical 2009-10-25 13:00:00 dst 1 > Asia/Dhaka: day 000: first failed: libc 2009-01-01 12:00:00 dst 0 != > libical 2009-01-01 13:00:00 dst 1 > Indian/Mauritius: day 297: first failed: libc 2009-10-25 12:00:00 dst > 0 != libical 2009-10-25 13:00:00 dst 1 > Africa/Tunis: day 087: first failed: libc 2009-03-29 12:00:00 dst 0 != > libical 2009-03-29 13:00:00 dst 1 > Africa/Tunis: day 297: okay again: libc 2009-10-25 12:00:00 dst 0 > Pacific/Apia: day 000: first failed: libc 2009-01-01 11:00:00 dst 0 != > libical 2009-01-01 12:00:00 dst 1 > Pacific/Apia: day 087: okay again: libc 2009-03-29 11:00:00 dst 0 > *** Summary: 401 zones tested, 1109 days failed, 145256 okay => 0% failed *** > FAIL: timezones Last time I worked on fixing this, I got to know it was impossible to get 100% success rate on this test without libical being able to 'remember histories of recurrence rules'. See + https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540676 + https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528902 and a couple other bugs which I can't get a hold of right now.. (it's probably mentioned in the comments of one of the above bugs) The bottom line is yes, you can expect this test to fail. -Suman |