From: Barry S. <che...@ch...> - 2010-05-03 18:08:20
|
Matijs van Zuijlen <ma...@ma...> skribis: > According to <http://whygitisbetterthanx.com/>, local branching is cheaper in > git (for some meaning of cheaper) than in Mercurial. This seems to be > corroborated by the information in > <http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/LocalbranchExtension>. Cheap local branching > to me would be a very strong argument for choosing Git. (Disclaimer: I'm much > more familiar with Git's command set, but I'm trying not to let that influence > my opinion too much here.) I wouldn't consider that an important feature -- to me redundancy is desirable, and fontforge is not a very large project -- but a git server still makes sense, because it can be used with the mercurial client: http://hg-git.github.com/ |