On 2/26/07, Melchior FRANZ <mfranz@aon.at> wrote:
* Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 25 February 2007:
> I would fix the files if people agree that what I consider a
> bug is indeed a bug.

I assume that the whole stuff should be dumped and replaced with
geo_*_wgs_84() functions, right? And this is the end of my one-man
thread.  :-)


For what it's worth, the geo*wgs_84() functions are *much* more computationally intensive than  the spherical functions.

For *many* purposes, the less accurate (but still pretty close) and more efficient functions work just fine.

We do need the wgs_84() functions for precise scenery calculations and precise navigation calculations.

Regards,

Curt.
--
Curtis Olson - University of Minnesota - FlightGear Project
http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/  http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/  http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d