Anders Gidenstam wrote :
> If it is not possible to be more restrictive on what ads to show (and > even if that can be done I'm sure the guys paying for these sort of ads > would do their best to by-pass any such restriction) then IMO the ads > should go. Maybe the text ads could stay but the big blobs - no, thank you.
I'm agreed with your opinion, ads should go in this case.
> Is the hosting really that expensive that we can't raise enough donations > to cover it? (I have to admit I have not donated to FG, though.)
I'm pretty sure that if some of us makes a donation, we could be able to cover hosting costs.
Let us know how many, and we could try to organize a donations campaign. If it's necessary.