From: Michael Hieke <michael.hieke@el...> - 2005-09-23 07:45:05
Milan Babuskov wrote:
>> This does not help us, as Makefile.in (with all rules) is created
>> by Bakefile. Maybe adding <include>@WX_INCLUDES@</include> to
>> flamerobin.bkl does the trick. But that would give a garbage
>> include directory to compilers...
> I don't like that too much.
well, me neither :-(
> Perhaps we could ask Vaclav Slavik to add support for windres in
> bakefile? I mean, I would, but I don't even know what exactly to ask
> of him.
According to David Elliot it's not something to do with Bakefile. To
> Perhaps we could add something like that to wxwin.m4. I hesitate to
> say add it to wx-config itself because it's so damn easy to get the
> flags based off the compiler flags it hardly makes sense to bloat wx-
> config with it.
There is in fact a tag <res-include> in Bakefile, adding the include
only to the res compiler invocation. But that one is not used in the
autoconf backend. It could help us, as a work-around. But it does not
really belong into Bakefile. A modification of wxwin.m4 would indeed be
the best. Unfortunately it won't be available to us for a long time,
even if they implement it right away. wx 2.6.3 at the earliest...