From: Claudio V. C. <cv...@us...> - 2001-03-26 03:34:44
|
Hello, all. While writing the article http://www.cvalde.com/document/computed_fields_conditional.htm several weeks ago, I noticed that I could drop the procedure that was used by the table's calculated field and (after inspection) that IB6 didn't track the dependency in rdb$dependencies. However, Ivan Prenosil did the same steps than me and he got the correct dependencies stored, to the point he couldn't drop the procedure as on would expect. The only difference is I used a couple of alter table commands while testing (created the table with one field, then defined the proc, then altered the table to add a computed field based on that proc), whereas Ivan got straight to the creation of the procedure first and then to the creation of the table with the computed field. Although I tried once to reproduce the steps I did and didn't reach a definitive conclusion, I thought I would let you know that there seems to be some order of definitions that can stop IB from tracking dependencies. C. --------- Claudio Valderrama C. Ingeniero en Informática - Consultor independiente http://www.cvalde.com |