Re: [Fink-users] GMP in /usr/local

[Alexander H. <ale...@gm...>]

I don’t do TCL, so that’s just absolute gibberish to me.

> On Mar 23, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Jack Howarth <how...@gm...> wrote:
> 
> Alexander,
>        Attached is the current MacPorts portsandbox.tcl which just
> seems to setup a profile to send to /usr/bin/sandbox-exec.
>                    Jack
> 
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Alexander Hansen
> <ale...@gm...> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Mar 23, 2015, at 4:26 PM, Cyrille Artho <cyr...@gm...> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> Thank you for your responses. I see that autotools are very eager to
>>> look into /usr/local no matter what, so I have built gcc by
>>> temporarily renaming /usr/local this time. I will try the other
>>> workaround next time.
>>> 
>>> Incidentally, Mac Ports seems to have found a solution:
>>> 
>>> "Note that starting with 2.3.0, MacPorts can automatically hide
>>> /usr/local (and all other files a port does not depend on) from ports'
>>> build systems. This feature is called trace mode and is activated by
>>> providing the -t flag to port".
>>> 
>>> This seems to work in almost all cases. I wonder if it is possible to
>>> implement this for fink? (I don't know how the "trace mode" works, but
>>> having this option would be helpful if it is known to work well.)
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Alexander Hansen
>>> <ale...@gm...> wrote:
>>>> 
>> 
>> It’s not just autotools, but the compilers as well.
>> 
>> We could likely do it in Fink if someone who is familiar with the Macports build system can translate how they to it to how we could do it.
>> 
>> --
>> Alexander Hansen, Ph.D.
>> Fink User Liaison
>> 
> <portsandbox.tcl>