On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au> wrote:
Hi Patrick

> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Pieter Palmers <pieterp@joow.be> wrote:
> > Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> >> So, what's going on?  It's not all that clear except that such a large
> >> tick difference should ordinarily not occur (hense the message).
> >> Perhaps the adapter is silently dropping frames - I seem to recall
> >> Pieter encountered such an adapter at some point but I can't recall
> >> whether it used your particular VIA chip or not.

For the benefits of others viewing list archives, I take it from a later
post in a different thread that this problem was solved by using a TI-based
OHCI adapter?  This would tend to indicate that the VIA chipset which is the
subject of this present thread is somewhat buggy and is best avoided if
The problem is avoided (not solved) by using a TI-based adapter.  For any list archive readers, please refer to issue #167 in the issue tracker for any possible future updates to this problem.