Re: [Exist-open] util:map-module questions and chalenges

[Evgeny G. <gaz...@gm...>]

2010/6/11 Thomas White <tho...@gm...>:
> I have tried to make  util:map-module work and after some chalenging moments
> I would like to ask have some questions.
>
> 1. When the util:map-module is called is there any check if the URI to
> module actually points to an existing file?

No

> 2. What happins if the URI is incorrent and it does not point to an existing
> module file?

You will have error message about not founded module source

> 3. How do I see the actuall URI that is mapped to a namespace?

Is it realy need? the mapped path are not changing aftrer mapping

> I think util:map-module should return true() if the mapping is successful ie
> the mapped module exists AND there are no compilation errors in it.
> To me only this is a success completion of the command. Otherwise we can map
> a module today and a week later when an XQuery tries to use the module it
> will throw and error for a missing module or a an error in the module.
>

This is not a function of mapping. Mapping is full analog of "at" clause.
So all your questions are actial for case when you use the "at" clause.
> Any comments?
>
> Thomas
>
>

--
Evgeny
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> Exist-open mailing list
> Exi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open
>