Work at SourceForge, help us to make it a better place! We have an immediate need for a Support Technician in our San Francisco or Denver office.
there are some comments in the examples like here:
perhaps they have to be removed?
Pietro Maria Liuzzo
These are the changes I have made
http://www.stoa.org/epidoc/gl/dev/supp-historigdate.html there is a sample text from RIB 309 in a comment. is this fine?
http://www.stoa.org/epidoc/gl/dev/trans-abbrevfully.html and http://www.stoa.org/epidoc/gl/dev/trans-reversed.html RIB ids are given also in a comment. I also don't understand which one of the two is the one used in RIB.
http://www.stoa.org/epidoc/gl/dev/trans-omitted.html I have moved the comment out of the example
http://www.stoa.org/epidoc/gl/dev/trans-paragraphos.html I have removed the first empty example and added the link to http://papyri.info/ddbdp/bgu;1;112 instead of the comment
http://www.stoa.org/epidoc/gl/dev/trans-vacatchar.html I have moved the comment about P Narm out of the example
I have added where possible some examples from edh. To handle the dispaly of these I have opened a feature request.