Re: Meeting notes of yesterday

[Ralph L. <Ral...@gm...>]

Hi Matej,

On 26/11/2014 11:52, Matej Sekoranja wrote:
> We’ve just discussed this yesterday. I’ve looked at the code and 
> changes are not trivial. I’ve patched caSecurity{.h,.cpp} to compile 
> (on both using preprocessor macros), but then there is putNotify 
> problem. I will not proceed and I’ll create a new tracker entry.

Yes, thank you.
Perfect match, since I have started working on the putNotify side of things.

>> I was planning to do the necessary changes on develop.
>> Are there plans to change the spec of V4 to include C++ parts to be
>> working with 3.15? Was that discussed at the telecon?
> pvCommonCPP, pvDataCPP and pvAccessCPP, normativeTypesCPP compile and work with 3.15.

As they only use the build system.

> pvDatabaseCPP fails because of pvaSrv dependency (can must remove this dependency in the future).

That's Marty's call.
I don't see that happening soon, as he based his example code on pvaSrv, 
IIRC. Even if those examples are separated out into their own module, 
that module would depend on pvaSrv.

> pvaSrv does not, but this is understandable since it uses core internals.

Yep.

> Should I attack my changes as a patch file in the tracker or commit to develop branch?

Just commit to develop. Thanks a lot!

~Ralph