Re: [E-devel] {Spam?} Re: entrance

[Vincent T. <vt...@un...>]

On Mon, 31 May 2010, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:

> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Vincent Torri <vt...@un...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Christopher Michael wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/31/2010 03:08 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Vincent Pomageot wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Entrance has been removed from svn 3 month ago.
>>>>> You can get it by checking out a revision before 46590.
>>>>
>>>> as quaker still don't want to (can't ?) work on a new entrance, I'm more
>>>> inclined to add it again to svn. He deleted it by saying a new one will
>>>> be added soon. 3 months later, nothing. The good thing would have be to
>>>> add an "entrance2" and do the move *after* the new code is in svn,
>>>> whatever the status of entrance was.
>>>>
>>>> Vincent
>>>>
>>>
>>> Or the other way ... moving 'entrance' to OLD (rather than total removal),
>>> and start working on entrance2 :)
>>
>> same thing, what is important is to not remove the old code before the
>> new one is in svn
>
> the code was broken and causing more harm than good. Actually it
> should have been removed way before.

no, it should have been fixed. And btw, it's strange. I have several 
reports from users that said that it was working.