Re: [E-devel] moving things along - cvs -> svn and bugs (bugzilla->trac)

[David S. <on...@gm...>]

On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 23:23:11 +1000 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
<ra...@ra...> wrote:

> On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:05:33 -0500 "Nathan Ingersoll"
> <nin...@gm...> babbled:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:19 AM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
> > <ra...@ra...> wrote:
> > >
> > > and i want to put in other cvs modules:
> > > misc/ -> misc/
> > > eterm/ -> old/eterm/
> > > web/www -> www/
> > > e16/ -> old/e16/
> > > e_modules/ -> apps/e_modules
> > 
> > Since both Eterm and e16 are actively maintained and use some of the
> > libs under libs, wouldn't it make sense for them to be under apps?
> > There are still plenty of users for them and placing them under old
> > seems like tagging them for near-term deprecation to me.
> 
> well - eterm is pretty much static. it does get the odd commit. e16 -
> yes. active, but it is the predecessor to e17 and i'd like to move
> things into an according place. something dead/old should go there -
> including old libs and apps that are basically dead or non-actively
> worked on.

Then perhaps large amounts of misc/ should go into old/?