From: Gustavo S. B. <bar...@pr...> - 2008-03-26 17:35:18
|
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Santiago Aguiar <san...@ed...> wrote: > I changed the patch to reflect Gustavo's comments. > > I left the part table lookup to keep the compile time check (besides > most embryo wrapper functions do something similar). Would it be ok to > add a GROUP:"name" construct to edc? Now it looks perfect :-) If nobody else spot problems I'll commit later today. As for GROUP:"name" it would be great and could help in the case of "type: GROUP", but I fear most for compile time checks, as converting them to numbers/integers will not help much. -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi Embedded Systems -------------------------------------- MSN: bar...@gm... Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (81) 9927 0010 |