Re: [E-devel] [Patch] Evas -- poorly-placed ++'s

[Tilman S. <ti...@co...>]

Eric Sandall [2005-12-13 11:16]:
> >    while (dst < dst_end)
> > -	*dst++ =3D (*src++ | PIXEL_SOLID_ALPHA) & (*dst | 0x00ffffff);
> > +	*dst =3D (*src | PIXEL_SOLID_ALPHA) & (*dst | 0x00ffffff);
> > +   	dst++;
> > +   	src++;
> > }
>=20
> Shouldn't pre-increment (e.g. ++dst) be used instead of post-increment
> (e.g. dst++) as the post-increment in C, IIRC, requires the object to
> be copied, incremented, and then reassigned, whereas the pre-increment
> just increments without all the copying and reassigning.

Since you cannot overload the ++ operator, and there are no classes and
objects in C, this doesn't apply to C at all.

Regards,
Tilman