Re: [Emc-developers] carousel_demo and duplicate O-word label

[Gene H. <ghe...@wd...>]

On Tuesday 04 August 2015 20:51:18 andy pugh wrote:

> On 25 July 2015 at 12:35, andy pugh <bod...@gm...> wrote:
> > As reported in
> > http://psha.org.ru/irc/%23emc/2015-07-22.html#16:59:29
> >
> > The G-code re-map in the carousel_demo branch gives the error:
> > 9:duplicate O-word label - already defined in line 29: 'O200 IF
> > [#<selected_tool> GT 0]'
>
> I have done some experimenting and I am coming to the conclusion that
> the test in line 861 is not a good test for duplicate O-words.
> http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=blob;f=src/emc/rs274ng
>c/interp_o_word.cc;h=084631e898b3ce00a9e5df5316b636fbe8bed1a8;hb=8b989a
>180e9e782d02a969da4c32def6c56d2004#l859
>
> I have not yet figured out what it is about the O100 if that triggers
> a problem in the next IF. (The error actually occurs during
> interpretation of the second IF)
> I have tried inserting other IF/ENDIF pairs in the code, but need to
> actually make some notes of the combinations to figure out the pattern

I may have encountered that, a year or more ago, so the exact memory is 
hazy now, and found that it went away if I quit using a capital O, so 
I've been using o100 style o-words ever since.  So you might want to 
include that in your pattern tests.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>