On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler <tcr@freebits.de> wrote:
Why are reads locked, but writes not? When does that make sense?

You are right, the lock was in %puthash but neither in %remhash nor in %gethash
 
If it's impractical, sure get rid of it. I just wanted to express the
opinion that implementation-provided synchronization can be very
convenient for users.

That was the original motivation when I added it to ECL, but I have the feeling that efficient bare structures plus also efficient synchronization macros is probably better -- and more explicit in the code that the user writes --. In any case this is just a poll, and currently 3-1 :-)

Juanjo

--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com