On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Anton Vodonosov <avodonosov@yandex.ru> wrote:
So, as ebafa5f2 has only improvements, next time I will use it
as the base version for comparison with the future HEAD.

Dear Anton, thanks again for your work on this and for the good news.. It seems your manual comparison of versions works better than the automated process I tried to construct. Would it be very difficult to set up your process in a more robust manner than mine?

Best,

Juanjo

--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) 
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com