The implications are simple: the developer / company / distributor must provide a binary of their application which can be linked against a newer version of ECL. No need for source distribution, no restriction w.r.t to economics of the distribution.


On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Andy Hefner <> wrote:
Note the implications of ECL's license (LGPL, unfortunately) when
considering statically linking with it.

This email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit --
Ecls-list mailing list

Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)