On 27 February 2011 14:52, Rupert Swarbrick <firstname.lastname@example.org
> Michael Wood <email@example.com
>> 2011/2/27 Rupert Swarbrick <firstname.lastname@example.org
>>> How should I make sure that the process finishes too? (I don't mind if
>>> I have to wait for it: this doesn't need to run in parallel)
>> Just a guess, but try changing ":wait nil" to ":wait t"?
> Surely that won't work? Won't that block and then I don't get to send it
> any data? (I haven't tried this, but I'm not at a computer with ecl atm)