I haven't notified the maintainers of the packages. Is there any correct/formal way to do this, or should I just mail the maintainers that appear in Hackage?
I uploaded my changes into a forked repo in https://github.com/serras/scion. I also uploaded the modified versions of prerrequisites in https://github.com/serras/scion-ghc-7-requisites. I hope that this helps.

2011/3/14 JP Moresmau <jpmoresmau@gmail.com>
Yes, I had started looking at it and did the same thing as you (play
around with list-tries, ghc-syb-utils, etc). Have you notified the
maintainers of these packages so they can upload GHC7-compatible
versions of the packages onto Hackage?
Thanks very much for your efforts!
I think the best way to proceed for you is to put your changes in
Scion on github in a fork from mine, so then I can pull them in when
everything is ok.

JP

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
<trupill@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been working on it for the last couple of days. I first tried to remove
> the bounds on GHC. I also upgraded some of the versions of the packages, and
> had to rebuild "list-tries" and "ghc-syb-utils" to remove the compile-time
> dependence on GHC 6.12 and use GHC 7.0.
> After adding some new instances of Search and tweaking things a bit, Scion
> is compiling. However, I think it is not going to work yet, because the type
> HsWrapper used in scion/lib/Inspect/TypeOf.hs has changed significantly from
> version 6.12
> [http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.12.3/html/libraries/ghc-6.12.3/HsBinds.html#t:HsWrapper]
> to version 7.0.2
> [http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.0.2/html/libraries/ghc-7.0.2/HsBinds.html#t:HsWrapper],
> and I don't know how to make it work.
> Is there any place where I can commit the new code so more people can take a
> look at it and try to make it work? I think that for somebody who knows the
> GHC internals, it will be matter of a second.
> In any case, I've taking care of adding all the new things between
> conditional compilation directive for GHC 7, and to change the Cabal file so
> differences between 6.12 and 7.0 are taken care (for example, exporting
> 'syb' in 7.0 instead of 'ghc-syb' in 6.12).
> Thanks in advance
>
> 2011/3/11 JP Moresmau <jpmoresmau@gmail.com>
>>
>> Yes, now that there's a new haskell platform available we should
>> support it. What you can do is extract the scion code, tweak the
>> scion.cabal file to remove the upper bound on GHC, and see if it
>> builds. Then use the generated exe in the Scion preferences.
>>
>> JP
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Alejandro Serrano Mena
>> <trupill@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > I've been using EclipseFP for several months. Yesterday, a new Haskell
>> > Platform package was uploaded, which includes GHC 7.0.2 as the default
>> > compiler.
>> > I've tried to use the new Platform in my EclipseFP installation [Eclipse
>> > Helios, Mac OS X 10.6] but the scion-server refuses to compile because
>> > of a
>> > dependency on GHC < 6.13. I've looked at the new ghc API package and
>> > seems
>> > very close to the old one, and I think all of the dependencies on scion
>> > are
>> > built correctly in GHC 7 according to Hackage.
>> > Is there any idea on how to add support for GHC 7? If so, I wouldn't
>> > mind
>> > helping tweakening some files...
>> > Thanks in advance
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Colocation vs. Managed Hosting
>> > A question and answer guide to determining the best fit
>> > for your organization - today and in the future.
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > eclipsefp-develop mailing list
>> > eclipsefp-develop@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eclipsefp-develop
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> JP Moresmau
>> http://jpmoresmau.blogspot.com/
>
>



--