Re: [Ebxmlrr-tech] ebXML registry for XDS

[Farrukh N. <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>]

Boaz Carmeli wrote:

>
>
>"Hi to all the Omar/ebXML community,
>
>I am considering the option of using the omar ebXML registry as a code base
>for implementing an XDS registry.
>I search the mailing list archive for inputs and insights about XDS on top
>of omar/ebXMLrr (Version 2.1/2.5) and found several valuable threads and
>recommendations.
>I wander what are the current viewpoint of the community about the registry
>version to be used for implementing XDS. Is it better to work with the old,
>compatible, 2.5 version, or should the 3.0 version be used as the code base
>for the XDS registry?
>  
>
Hi Boaz,

First a warm welcome to the freebXML Registry community.

XDS is based upon ebXML Registry 2.0. I have suggested to IHE/XDS folks 
to align with version 3.0 but they are not yet there.
The freebXML Registry team suggests all our users use our 3.0 bits as 
that is what we support. Maybe someone from IHE/XDS
community can comment better. Thanks.