Menu
▾
▴
Re: [E1000-devel] RX lockup problem
|
From: Brandeburg, J. <jes...@in...> - 2006-05-30 16:32:48
|
On Fri, 26 May 2006, Jan-Patrick Perisse wrote: > Sorry for the delay. Just could test it today. Sorry I didn't get back to you on friday. > I am using a 2.4 kernel with SMP as stated before. The machine has a dual > 1000BaseT onboard and a dual 1000BaseSX offboard. > I tried to lock the parameters as stated below but got two problems: > 1- The parameter for full duplex is not Duplex=3DFull but Duplex=3D2 (loo= ked on > the driver source) bah, my bad. > 2- The fiber board doesn't accept locking the parameters. that makes sense, If i tested on fiber more often I'd probably know that. > Sorry, guys but I really think it is a driver problem, as it locks up the > machine when it shouldn't. yeah, that seems odd, but I thought that you said the latest drivers don't= =20 lock up. > The others (1000BaseT and 1000BaseSX working with a foundry switch) are f= ine. > Just the 1000BaseSX with the CISCO 5505 module gets CRC errors but just o= n the > linux side. It only locks up > Does anyone have one of those switches? Anyone has access to the firmware= so > that I can upgrade it. I tried with Cisco Brazil but they don't have it. We might have one, i'm waiting to find out. > If I can't solve it this way, I am willing to put the switch and machine > (another one) available on the net so that you can try. Unfortunately I don't think I can help too much with debugging your cisco= =20 settings. Is there any way you can just wipe out the configuration for=20 that port and start over? Do you have vlan's enabled for the device as well? It looks like your=20 configuration has them enabled at the switch (but I don't know if it is an= =20 internal to the switch vlan only, or one you have to configure your end=20 point systems to use) > Do you think upgrading to a 2.6 kernel could solve the problem? I doubt upgrading would solve your problem. Do you have any tcpdump=20 output for the failing case? If you had a system with a 2.6 kernel on it= =20 already you could try the fiber adapter in it. Also, you may want to enable the Store Bad Packets (SBP) bit in the driver= =20 source, and then do tcpdump and save it to a file. Jesse >=20 > Thanks again. >=20 > At 09:54 PM 4/11/2006, Jesse Brandeburg wrote: >=20 >=20 > > On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Jan-Patrick Perisse wrote: > > > Jesse, it is a fiber link. What would be a proper configuration for e= 1000? > > > > > > Cisco 5505 shows the following: > > > 5505_1> (enable) sh port 1/1 > > > Port Name Status Vlan Level Duplex Speed Ty= pe > > > ----- ------------------ ---------- ---------- ------ ------ ----- > > ------------ > > > 1/1 connected 1 high full 1000 1000Bas= eSX > > > > > > Port Trap IfIndex > > > ----- -------- ------- > > > 1/1 disabled 3 > > > > > > Port Broadcast-Limit Broadcast-Drop > > > -------- --------------- -------------- > > > 1/1 - 0 > > > > > > Port Send FlowControl Receive FlowControl RxPause TxPause > > Unsupported > > > admin oper admin oper opc= odes > > > ----- -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- ------- > > ----------- > > > 1/1 off off on on 0 0 0 > > > > > > > > > Port Align-Err FCS-Err Xmit-Err Rcv-Err UnderSize > > > ----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- > > > 1/1 0 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > Port Single-Col Multi-Coll Late-Coll Excess-Col Carri-Sen Runts > > Giants > > > ----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- > > --------- > > > 1/1 0 0 0 > > > 0 0 0 0 > > > > > > Last-Time-Cleared > > > -------------------------- > > > Fri Mar 31 2006, 03:26:50 > > > > > > set module name 1 > > > set vlan 1 1/1-2 > > > set port enable 1/1-2 > > > set port level 1/1-2 high > > > set port duplex 1/1-2 full > > > set port trap 1/1-2 disable > > > set port name 1/1-2 > > > set port security 1/1-2 disable > > > set port broadcast 1/1-2 100% > > > set port membership 1/1-2 static > > > set port protocol 1/1-2 ip on > > > set port protocol 1/1-2 ipx off > > > set port negotiation 1/1-2 disable > > > set port flowcontrol send 1/1-2 off > > > set port flowcontrol receive 1/2 off > > > set port flowcontrol receive 1/1 on > > > set cdp disable 1/1-2 > > > set cdp interval 1/1-2 60 > > > set trunk 1/1 off negotiate 1-1005 > > > set trunk 1/2 off negotiate 1-1005 > > > set spantree portfast 1/1-2 disable > > > set spantree portcost 1/1-2 4 > > > set spantree portpri 1/1-2 32 > > > set spantree portvlanpri 1/1 0 > > > set spantree portvlanpri 1/2 0 > > > set spantree portvlancost 1/1 cost 3 > > > set spantree portvlancost 1/2 cost 3 > >=20 > >=20 > > everything here looks okay, have you tried forcing speed and duplex on = the > > e1000 (you shouldn't have to, but maybe) > >=20 > > i would expect to be seeing errors on both ends, unless the fiber cable > > or the laser is the problem and only one direction is seeing issues. > >=20 > > how about sending us the output of ethtool ethX, and ethtool -d ethX > >=20 > > then try forcing > > modprobe e1000 Speed=3D1000,1000,1000,1000 Duplex=3DFull,Full,Full,Full > > or > > ethtool -s ethX autoneg off speed 1000 duplex full > >=20 > > Jesse > >=20 > >=20 > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting lang= uage > > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live we= bcast > > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territ= ory! > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat= =3D121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > E1000-devel mailing list > > E10...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel > >=20 > > -- > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo sistema de antiv=EDrus e > > acredita-se estar livre de perigo. >=20 > Jan-Patrick P=E9riss=E9 > AEON TECHNOLOGIES > (21) 2705-3139 / 2705-3028 > http://www.aeontech.com.br >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 |