From: <ju...@su...> - 2000-07-02 04:48:52
|
I can't remember if I mentioned this before, but adopting an open source license was one of the requriements for project acceptance at SF. The original DUnit (JUnit) license was open enough, but it was not one of the standard ones so it would have required more steps to get the SF setup going. Among the standard licenses offered I chose the Mozilla Open Source License. It's a license that lets you do what you like with the code, as long as you make public any modifications and derivations of the original. There are even less restrictive licenses available. I chose the Mozilla one because it's more "laizzes faire" than the LGPL, yet it binds people to keep the source open, which I think is only fair given the time an effort already devoted to get the project going. Please, let me know your thoughts about this. Juanco -- Juancarlo Añez mailto:ju...@su... http://www.suigeneris.org/juanca/ --- |