Although you confused me by mentioning Solr/ES stats
Dňa 31.10.2012 0:07, "Ingram, William A" <email@example.com> napísal(-a):
> Nevertheless, I would be very surprised if most, if not all, of a solution for 1.x couldn't be easily ported to 3.x. I have not had a chance to thoroughly dig into the 3.0 codebase, but I would guess the changes are not that radical. But if it turns out 3.0 is so entirely different from 1.x, then we are even less likely to move to it in the short term.
You're right, there are no radical changes.
> As far as I am concerned, the current tools available for displaying stats work fine: Atmire stats, Elastic Search etc. The piece that needs improvement is accurate stats recording. It would seem that is where we should focus our efforts. The crucial ingredient to Edinburgh's GA stats system is forcing outside, direct links to open the item page, rather than hitting the PDF directly (otherwise the download isn't counted). I doubt that would be different in 3.0.
A similar but alternative approach would be to keep the bitstream url pointing directly at the bitstream and create another url in its stead with the functionality is mentioned (redirect to bitstream) , I then replace all occurrences of the bitstream link with the later. Both have its pros and cons when used with non-interactive user agents (like wget/curl).