Re: [Dri-users] DRI but not DRI

[Jorge N. <com...@za...>]

Ingo Saitz wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 09:25:06PM +0200, Jorge Nerin wrote:
>
>>But my problem is that in xscreensaver the hacks that works ok in a 
>>window doesn't get hw accelerated when run as a xscreensaver hack. I 
>>have managed to get the output of glxinfo as if it were a hack of 
>>xscreensaver, and here is the diff of LIBGL_DEBUG="verbose" glxinfo when 
>>runnig in a window (Eterm) or in xscreensaver as a hack:
>>
>
>Probably xsreensaver does some magic using the LD_LIBRARY_PATH or
>LD_PRELOAD variables. Compare the output of ldd on a dri
>application both from an xterm and run as xscreensaver hack.
>Probably you have an old libGL.so lying around that only gets
>used by xscreensaver hacks?
>
>    Ingo
>
No, it seems that this is not the case here both runs show the same 
libraries used, BTW I only have :
-rw-r--r--    1 root     root       534486 jun  5 11:25 
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.a
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           10 jun 13 16:36 
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so -> libGL.so.1
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           12 jun  6 16:32 
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.1.2
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       489597 jun  5 11:25 
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1.2
And I don't seem to have old libraries lying around, I'm begining to 
suspect of libglide3, but I donwloaded it from dri.sourceforge.net abut 
the same time I downloaded v0.7, and it worked ok in v0.7, who knows?

-- 
Jorge Nerin
<com...@za...>