From: Tilman S. <ti...@co...> - 2006-07-04 15:51:17
|
Jerome Glisse [2006-07-03 23:49]: > I want to cleanup a bit the r300 code, there is a lot of dead > code. I also would like to use unified indenting rules and > function naming rules. Good idea :) > For indenting rules i personnaly use the linux kernel ones, > iirc this was the original indenting choosed by Nicolai. > Anyway, we can use another if people prefer another one > (as long as the indenting you propose is not severly broken). Shouldn't we stick to the Mesa indentation rules? > For function name i think that r300DoSomething is for > function called by mesa and r300_do_otherthings is for > internal driver function at leat this is my guess from looking > at i915 driver :) I'd prefer not to mix up CamelCase and snake_case. Do you think the benefit it provides is good enough to make up for the inconsistency? Regards, Tilman --=20 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? |