From: Vladimir D. <vo...@mi...> - 2005-03-05 01:18:58
|
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Vladimir Dergachev writes: > >> We should probably have analogous code for r300. > > Do you mean we should have swtcl code for r300, or something else? There are two issues: 1. As was explained to me we need to have swtcl code in case we need to do software fallback for some unsupported feature 2. Right *now* we are doing only swtcl, as no acceleration for transform and lightning is being done. So either way there is some code to port/write. best Vladimir Dergachev > > Paul. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > -- > _______________________________________________ > Dri-devel mailing list > Dri...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel > |