Re: glxinfo: R200 VS FGLRX side by side...

[Mike M. <che...@ya...>]

--- Alex Deucher <ale...@gm...> wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:27:28 -0700, Ian Romanick <id...@us...> wrote:
> > Mike Mestnik wrote:
> > 
> > > Here is a straigth diff, I didn't do a udiff since I think we all
> know the
> > > glxinfo output fairly well.  I did make one change s/, $//g and s/,
> /\n
> > > /g.  I'm also attaching the 'source'.
> > 
> > A better way to get "meaningful" diffs is to pipe the output of
> glxinfo
> > to "grep GL_ | sed 's/, /\n/g' | sort -u".  It's a bit more tricky for
> > GLX extensions because there are multiple listings for that (client,
> > server, and "combined").
> > 
> > Looking at the list, I noticed a couple of odd things.  Why don't the
> > ATI drivers support GL_{ARB,EXT,NV}_texture_rectange or
> > GL_{ARB,EXT}_blend_equation_separate?  Beyond that, there are
> basically
> > 5 groups of useful extensions that they have but we don't:
> > 
> > - GL_ARB_texture_env_crossbar
> > - GL_ARB_occlusion_query and similar extensions.
> > - GL_ARB_point_parameters (I thought support was added for this?)
> > - GL_EXT_multi_draw_arrays
> > - GL_EXT_fog_coord
> > 
> > Crossbar, point parameters, and multi draw arrays should be easy
> enough
> > to add.  I tried to add support for fog coord, but there's some bit of
> > documentation that we're missing.  I just could not get it to work in
> > TCL mode. :(  For occlusion query, we're missing a significant amount
> of
> > documentation.
> > 
> 
> Vladimir's glxtest code may be helpful in figuring out the missing
> bits if anyone is so inclined...
> 
Are you implying that this program will/could work with the fglrx driver?

> Alex
> 



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail