Re: [Dri-devel] lnx_agp.c actualy USED? Why double-AGP ?

[Nathan H. <na...@ma...>]

On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 11:23:50PM -0700, Philip Brown wrote:
> [ Nathan Hand writes ]
> 
> > The DRI is open source. The CVS is open. The mailing list is open. Everyone
> > is allowed to contribute. PI releases every scrap of documentation possible
> > and discusses nearly everything on the public mailing list.
> > What more can PI do? 
> 
> Well, since you did ask specifically, "what more can P.I. do?":
> 
> Code to APIs. Don't write APIs to match the code after you've written it.

What makes you think it wasn't done this way?

> > Because it isn't the console you want to authorise. You authorise against a
> > X11 session. 
> 
> You have described what DRI does currently. You haven't described WHY it
> does it that way, which was my question.

I think I have. The WHY and the WHAT have the same answer.

> PS: Odd, you give the impression you work for P.I.
> But you're not on the "team" page of the website

I'm sorry if I gave that impression: I didn't intend to.