From: Ryan H. <rm...@gm...> - 2008-06-28 19:59:58
|
Is anyone working on cleaning up the drm code so that it works with the latest -mm sources. I sure would like to use r500 drm with an -mm kernel. -Ryan |
From: Alex D. <ale...@gm...> - 2008-06-28 20:14:36
|
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Hope <rm...@gm...> wrote: > Is anyone working on cleaning up the drm code so that it works with > the latest -mm sources. I sure would like to use r500 drm with an -mm > kernel. Dave submitted r5xx drm support in the last drm kernel update. Alex |
From: Ryan H. <rm...@gm...> - 2008-06-29 17:26:13
|
that is for vanilla kernel i am pretty sure, I am asking about the -mm patchset, i tried building the latest drm from git againsts -mm and it does not build -Ryan On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Alex Deucher <ale...@gm...> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Hope <rm...@gm...> wrote: >> Is anyone working on cleaning up the drm code so that it works with >> the latest -mm sources. I sure would like to use r500 drm with an -mm >> kernel. > > Dave submitted r5xx drm support in the last drm kernel update. > > Alex > |
From: Dave A. <ai...@li...> - 2008-06-30 02:50:16
|
> Is anyone working on cleaning up the drm code so that it works with > the latest -mm sources. I sure would like to use r500 drm with an -mm > kernel. The upstream drm already contains r500 support so the -mm kernel should have anything you need, you shouldn't need to build out-of-tree drm against it, Howeever we don't track -mm kernels for out-of-tree building they are too much of a moving target.. Dave. |
From: Ryan H. <rm...@gm...> - 2008-06-30 04:41:45
|
I will test again, but when I tried using the in-kernel drm i got a message from glxgears saying I needed a newer version... -Ryan On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Dave Airlie <ai...@li...> wrote: > >> Is anyone working on cleaning up the drm code so that it works with >> the latest -mm sources. I sure would like to use r500 drm with an -mm >> kernel. > > The upstream drm already contains r500 support so the -mm kernel should > have anything you need, you shouldn't need to build out-of-tree drm > against it, > > Howeever we don't track -mm kernels for out-of-tree building they are too > much of a moving target.. > > Dave. > |
From: Ryan H. <rm...@gm...> - 2008-06-30 20:35:32
|
I doubled checked today, drm from -rc5-mm3 does not support r500. I am using xorg-server 1.4.2, libdrm from git, mesa from git, and radeonhd from git. When I run glxgears i get this: $ glxgears R500 support requires a newer drm. -Ryan On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Ryan Hope <rm...@gm...> wrote: > I will test again, but when I tried using the in-kernel drm i got a > message from glxgears saying I needed a newer version... > -Ryan > > On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Dave Airlie <ai...@li...> wrote: >> >>> Is anyone working on cleaning up the drm code so that it works with >>> the latest -mm sources. I sure would like to use r500 drm with an -mm >>> kernel. >> >> The upstream drm already contains r500 support so the -mm kernel should >> have anything you need, you shouldn't need to build out-of-tree drm >> against it, >> >> Howeever we don't track -mm kernels for out-of-tree building they are too >> much of a moving target.. >> >> Dave. >> > |