From: Felix W. <Fel...@os...> - 2006-10-07 22:07:20
|
Alan G Isaac wrote: > It would be helpful to have a > --suppress-image-extension > option in the LaTeX writers. I'm not sure if I wanna have such an option in the core. It seems kinda kludgey. Have to think about it though. > (LaTeX knows how to look for the appropriate > extension, which differs for pdflatex.) Why would you want to use latex at all, as opposed to pdflatex? You can always do pdf2ps for the resulting PDF file, and pdflatex has some cool things like automatic border gray correction that latex cannot do. I'm seriously considering dropping support for latex in rst2newlatex completely, so I'd be interested why you'd wanna use it. > PS Query: if I understand it right, > rst2newlatex > would seem to be more accurately named > rst2tex? Nope. It's definitely LaTeX, not TeX. Please, no discussion right now about why the generated LaTeX code looks so unreadable. It's gonna become a bit more readable in the future, and I'll write some documentation about why it looks so weird. Best, Felix -- Felix Wiemann -- http://www.ososo.de/ |