Menu
▾
▴
docutils-develop
|
From: engelbert g. <eng...@gm...> - 2012-01-03 12:14:48
|
hei which email address should we put on documents ? 1. many are from LeaWiemann, which i did not see around for a long time. 2. just because someone offered to contribute, s/he might not be available for maintenance. add ``Maintenance: doc...@li...`` cheers -- http://darefoot.blogspot.com |
|
From: David G. <go...@py...> - 2012-01-03 16:43:44
|
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 07:14, engelbert gruber <eng...@gm...> wrote: > which email address should we put on documents ? > > 1. many are from LeaWiemann, which i did not see around for a long time. > 2. just because someone offered to contribute, s/he might not be available > for maintenance. > > add ``Maintenance: doc...@li...`` Sure, sounds good. Maybe remove individual email addresses? I'd be happy not to get such email anymore... -- David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger> |
|
From: engelbert g. <eng...@gm...> - 2012-01-03 17:37:43
|
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 5:43 PM, David Goodger <go...@py...> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 07:14, engelbert gruber > <eng...@gm...> wrote: >> which email address should we put on documents ? >> >> 1. many are from LeaWiemann, which i did not see around for a long time. >> 2. just because someone offered to contribute, s/he might not be available >> for maintenance. >> >> add ``Maintenance: doc...@li...`` > > Sure, sounds good. > Maybe remove individual email addresses? I'd be happy not to get such > email anymore... then we could make it:: :Author: David Goodger :Contact: doc...@li... or :: :Author: David Goodger :Maintenance: doc...@li... cheers engelbert -- http://darefoot.blogspot.com |
|
From: David G. <go...@py...> - 2012-01-03 17:43:48
|
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:37, engelbert gruber <eng...@gm...> wrote: > then we could make it:: > > :Author: David Goodger > :Contact: doc...@li... +1. That's easier and, I think, better. > or :: > > :Author: David Goodger > :Maintenance: doc...@li... -0. "Contact" is more general than "Maintenance". -- David Goodger <http://python.net/~goodger> |
|
From: Guenter M. <mi...@us...> - 2012-01-04 11:06:46
|
On 2012-01-03, David Goodger wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:37, engelbert gruber
><eng...@gm...> wrote:
>> then we could make it::
>> :Author: David Goodger
>> :Contact: doc...@li...
> +1. That's easier and, I think, better.
>> or ::
>> :Author: David Goodger
>> :Maintenance: doc...@li...
> -0. "Contact" is more general than "Maintenance".
"Contact" is clear and easy.
Nevertheless, I suggest the "standardized" term from the `Open Source
Metadata Framework`__ (OMF) [#]_:
:Maintainer: The person or organization responsible for publishing the
resource in its current form. If left blank, this value
defaults to CREATOR. (RFC822 format)
.. [#] Based on the Dublin Core recommendation (http://purl.oclc.org/DC/)
OMF aims to provide a framework for resource discovery and use, and is
tailored to the needs of the opensource documentation community.
__ http://www.ibiblio.org/osrt/omf/index.html
Günter
|
|
From: engelbert g. <eng...@gm...> - 2012-01-04 11:55:11
|
ok next time i come around is Maintainer in translations, does the standard tell something about it ? cheers On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Guenter Milde <mi...@us...> wrote: > On 2012-01-03, David Goodger wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:37, engelbert gruber >><eng...@gm...> wrote: >>> then we could make it:: > >>> :Author: David Goodger >>> :Contact: doc...@li... > >> +1. That's easier and, I think, better. > >>> or :: > >>> :Author: David Goodger >>> :Maintenance: doc...@li... > >> -0. "Contact" is more general than "Maintenance". > > > "Contact" is clear and easy. > > Nevertheless, I suggest the "standardized" term from the `Open Source > Metadata Framework`__ (OMF) [#]_: > > :Maintainer: The person or organization responsible for publishing the > resource in its current form. If left blank, this value > defaults to CREATOR. (RFC822 format) > > > .. [#] Based on the Dublin Core recommendation (http://purl.oclc.org/DC/) > OMF aims to provide a framework for resource discovery and use, and is > tailored to the needs of the opensource documentation community. > > __ http://www.ibiblio.org/osrt/omf/index.html > > > Günter > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex > infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to > virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual > desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure > costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox > _______________________________________________ > Docutils-develop mailing list > Doc...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/docutils-develop > > Please use "Reply All" to reply to the list. -- http://darefoot.blogspot.com |
|
From: Guenter M. <mi...@us...> - 2012-01-05 13:37:09
|
On 2012-01-04, engelbert gruber wrote: > ok next time i come around > is Maintainer in translations, does the standard tell something about it ? Which standard? Docutils, or OMF. Maintainer is currently not recognized as docinfo keyword. This makes "Maintainer" preferable for Python modules, but "Contact" preferable for rst source files. Günter |
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X