#2 Naming and Versioning of Publishers' Schema

closed-fixed
nobody
Publishers (9)
5
2012-02-15
2010-05-23
Thomas Schraitle
No

Hi,

the Publishers' Schema Specification [1] describes a lot of details, which is fine. However, there is no section how to name and access the publishers schema. According to [2] there should be naming convention in the version attribute. Does the committee consider this as something worth or is it out of scope?

Thanks,
Tom

--- Reference:
[1] https://docbook.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/docbook/trunk/docbook/relaxng/publishers/spec/publishers.xml
[2] http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/#cust-naming

Discussion

  • Scott Hudson
    Scott Hudson
    2012-02-15

    Based on discussions on the docbook-tc list here: http://markmail.org/message/nptc5zxnqlrujgo5?q=variant+list:org%2Eoasis-open%2Elists%2Edocbook-tc and the DocBook Publishers SC meeting on 15 Feb 2012, the decision is to use "5.0-variant publishers-1.0" for the version attribute value for the currently released specification. The required version will be clearly documented in the next version of the specification.

     
  • Scott Hudson
    Scott Hudson
    2012-02-15

    • status: open --> closed-fixed