From: Tony E. <to...@he...> - 2007-08-20 11:04:59
|
Scott Kitterman skrev, on 19-08-2007 21:51: [...] > What I'd do in your position is figure out which library is doing the TXT > substring concantenation and see if it gets it wrong. That would be my bet. Good catch, though it wasn't the concatenation. Why didn't I look at the dkim-filter log? 2.1.1 is now giving much better output that earlier versions. All of the messages Mark sent yesterday (Postfix log) failed with: SSL error:04077068:rsa routines:RSA_verify:bad signature. dkim-filter (libdkim) has been built with openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5 (Red Hat), all Mark's signatures are signed a=rsa-sha1. But then, so are yours (from earlier) and yours are passing. Maybe someone could comment on that? --Tonni -- Tony Earnshaw Email: tonni at hetnet dot nl |