Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Routing problem?
|
From: Tegge, B. <te...@re...> - 2003-01-08 17:45:00
|
Am 18:27 08.01.2003 +0100 schrieb Maarten van den Berg: >On Wednesday 08 January 2003 18:16, john papadeas wrote: > > this is my routing table > > ~# route -n > > Kernel IP routing table > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags > > Metric Ref Use Iface > > 212.89.163.192 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U > > 0 0 0 eth0 > > 212.89.163.192 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U > > 0 0 0 eth1 > > 0.0.0.0 212.89.163.194 0.0.0.0 UG > > 1 0 0 eth0 > >This routingtable is wrong. It has two routes to identical ranges, but >through different interfaces. That is just as impossible as one person >traveling over two itineraries at the same time. ;-) > > > the ip range i use is mine > >Can be, but you can never use the same range both in- and outside. Not >without subnetting it into two smaller ranges (or masquerading into an >rfc 1918 range, or even bridging instead of routing) > > > i do not use any dhp server each box has its own > > static ip. > > so basicly the DL box uses the cisco as gateway on > > eth0 the rest of the internal network uses to DL box > > as a gateway on eth1 > >Then you must either subnet (you'd also have to reconfig the cisco in this >case, in addition to the devil-linux box) or use masquerading altogether. It should also be possible to set up host specific routes for each of the internal hosts like : ip route add 212.89.163.195 dev eth1 >Greetings, >Maarten > > > --- Heiko Zuerker <hz...@pr...> wrote: > > > On 01/08/2003 09:48:24 AM john papadeas wrote: > > > >INTERNET-----Cisco > > > >router---(eth0)Devil(eth1)----Switch---Clients > > > >Dose it matter that I am using real ip's ? > > > >Is there some king of routing or bridging i must > > > > > > do? > > > > > > Verify the routing table with "route -n". > > > Are those "real" IP adresses also officially yours? > > > Does you're Cisco know that the DL box is the router > > > for the client > > > network? > > > > > > Regards > > > Heiko > > |