From: Ben L. <ben...@gm...> - 2008-05-31 15:14:34
|
On Saturday 31 May 2008, Lucas Malor wrote: > Andrés Delfino had submitted to Bugzilla@Mozilla a request to add > DejaVu fonts to Firefox installer. It seems anyway there's some > licence problems: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408497#c4 What are the exact problems then? Note that we can't change the license, the copyright for the Vera glyphs is owned by Bitstream. > Some questions: > 1) What are the differences between your project and Free UCS Outline > one ( http://www.gnu.org/software/freefont/ ) We have a community behind DejaVu, the Freefonts are mainly done by one person. Our fonts are also much better for screen display. > or ClearlyU one ( > http://crl.nmsu.edu/~mleisher/cu.html )? We're not a bitmap font. > 2) Your fonts provide a larger range coverage of characters than > those two other projects? Freefonts have some scripts DejaVu doesn't have and vice versa. ClearlyU has also a few (Thaanna, Thai) that DejaVu doesn't have > 3) Your chars are vectorial? Yes. > 4) Do you use FreeType? Your fonts are compatible with all common > OSes (Windows, Linux, Mac)? Fonts don't use FreeType, Freetype is just one of the font rendering engines. Our fonts should render well on all platforms. > PS: do you know if Unifont project is still alive? > http://www.unicodecharacter.com/ Don't know. But in general bitmap fonts are only useful as fall back font if there's no other font which has certain glyphs. Greetings Ben |