#555 Costing Enhancements

closed-works-for-me
nobody
Costing (2)
5
2006-10-27
2006-01-13
Teo Sarca
No

Hello,

The "product costing" feature (CostElement, Cost,
CostDetail, CostQueue ...) has a very nice design, but
i am facing with the folowing problem: i need to handle
costing on warehouse level. For this i need to change
all costing tables structure (to add the M_Warehouse_ID
field) and to modify the source code.

My suggestion is if you can add "CostingDimension" (a
table to handle AD_Client_ID, AD_Org_ID, M_ASI_ID,
M_Warehouse_ID, and whatever you want), to the costing
schema.

In this case, the "product costing" will be more
flexible and easy to adapt for client business.

Best regards,
Teo Sarca

Discussion

  • Jorg Janke
    Jorg Janke
    2006-01-13

    • status: open --> pending-works-for-me
     
  • Jorg Janke
    Jorg Janke
    2006-01-13

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=87038

    We had a long discussion about this and decided, that the
    bst approach is NOT to have the warehouse, but the
    organization part of "the key".
    Warehouses must have an organization for ownership. But,
    warehouses are logical entities (e.g. you can manage
    different status/availability with it - in a single
    physical warehouse). The overhead is negectable, so just
    create an opragization for the warehouse.

     
  • Kathy Pink
    Kathy Pink
    2006-10-27

    • status: pending-works-for-me --> closed-works-for-me