Re: [coLinux-users] Wiki at Wikia or SourceForge?

[Steve W. <li...@la...>]

On my opinion i dont like the way SourceForge integrates the services
like bugtracker and wiki because the are ugly to use and the look.

So i give a third suggestion. Why dont move to google code. The have a
very clean and easy bugtracker and also support for wiki and svn version
control.

Steve

Henry Nestler schrieb:
> Hello,
> 
> after big database error since September 18 2008 (see [1]), our Wiki 
> host is shutting down now [2]. There is no big problem, as we have Wikia 
> as fall back for quickly access mostly of pages.
> 
> The current plan is to use SF new service "Hosted Apps". But, before I 
> restore some of the pages from my backup to any place, I would ask for 
> your opinions.
> 
>     Go back to Wikia or goto SourceForge?
> 
> Here is a list of differences, I found.
> Wikia:					| SourceForge.net:
> anonymously edits allowed	| Must login on SF for edit
> Full history, back to 2006		| Can only import last page status¸see [3]
> Short wiki URL, for exmple [4]	| Long URL for a page, for example [3]
> Oversized skin "Monaco"		| Fast and small skin "Monobook"
> Many ads and animated flash	| Currently no ads. I feel it comes on top 
> banner.
> Top Google ranking			| Would perhaps never stay on top of results.
> 
> [1] http://scribblewikiblog.com/downtime/#comment-134
> [2] http://scribblewikiblog.com/scribblewiki-is-shutting-down/
> [3] http://apps.sourceforge.net/mediawiki/colinux/index.php?title=26images
> [4] http://colinux.wikia.com/wiki/26images
>