From: Sam S. <sd...@gn...> - 2002-10-07 15:18:14
|
> * In message <3DA...@ma...> > * On the subject of "Re: [clisp-list] floating point problems with clisp 2.30" > * Sent on Sun, 06 Oct 2002 22:53:50 +0300 > * Honorable "Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <vv...@ma...> writes: > > Unfortunately this doesn't explain wrong numeric values which I get > for some special functions in Maxima with clisp 2.30 since the value > above is correct. note that BESSEL &co call explicit (FLOAT * 1.0) which can easily result in floating point contagion. again, _please_ supply me with an test example where a CLISP built-in function produces incorrect results (either WRT precision, of value or whatever). thanks. -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat7.3 GNU/Linux <http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/> <http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html> Murphy's Law was probably named after the wrong guy. |