Re: subrkw.d & init_subr_tab_2

[Bruno H. <br...@cl...>]

Hi Sam,

> It appears that the only reason we have subrkw.d in addition to subr.d is:
> 
>  --- TURBO-C doesn't get enough memory for compilation!

Yes, that was the main reason.

> So, we can get rid of subrkw.d now!
> The new code generates a larger run time (by a 0.2%, or 4k)
> and a larger memory image (by 0.1%, or 3.5k) though.

This optimization is not worth keeping. Earlier, without CLOS and
tons of other stuff in the memory image, the savings were higher.
But now...

Bruno
-- 
In memoriam Anne Boleyn <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Boleyn>