> > I do a lot of string concatenation, generating a large string of HTML
> > page, built from lots of small strings retrieved from a database, so I
> > wrote a replacement for EXT:STRING-CONCAT that speeds things up a lot
> > for my appl. It works by working with a growable string array and
> > pre-allocating space as it gets bigger.
It sounds like you're going to end up writing the concatenated string
to a socket stream. Why not output the strings separately?
I wonder how
(loop for s in strings do (princ s st)))