On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 01:31:34PM -0800, Jonathan Kotker wrote:It looks good to me. CIL should be more modular, avoid these hard-coded paths,
> Is there anything else I should be including? The above files seem to be
> the only ones the tool needs. Or is there a better way to go about this
> entire process?
etc. but I've thought several times about it and I'm not sure how to do it
By the way, if you want your users to target other architecture, consider
documenting/using --envmachine (which avoids recompiling CIL).