Re: [Cerb-list] strange problems

[Dariusz K. <ta...@ta...>]

Hello Pawel,

Monday, June 23, 2003, 1:18:13 AM, you wrote:

+>> I was thinking that maybe my hardware is broken, I repeated it again
+>> and got exactly same address and line:
> No. It's cerb fault.

that's good :) because I started to worry, because machine which is
running server is designed for desktop :P

+>> Any idea?
+>> Please reply.
+>> 
+>> I'm not much experienced with debugging, so please tell me if you want
+>> more informations (and how to get them).
+>> That error was on cerber 1.0 RC2, I didn't experience anything like
+>> that on RC1.

> Yes, this is because of (as I said before) arguments races protector.
> You can turn it of by changing VM_PROT_READ to VM_PROT_ALL in
> cerb_usmalloc.c. But then cerb will not be safe.

I have only one processor it's possible to be dangerous? I don't know
how this work internally, but since cerb is kernel module I thought
it's won't do ie. 2 jobs simultaneously, so I though it could be safe
on uniprocessor machines, am I wrong?


-- 
Best regards,
 Dariusz                            mailto:ta...@ta...
SCSA, SCNA, LPI, CCNA, MCP certified