[Cdk-devel] Re: question about HybridizationStateATMatcher

[Egon W. <eg...@us...>]

On Saturday 16 July 2005 00:34, Rajarshi Guha wrote:
> I'm in line with Joerg's view (mentioned before on this and other lists)
> that we need to consider cheminformatics developement as a software
> engineering situation. And hence, we need some rigor. I think Egons
> proposal of a QA team and the limitations module are the beginnings of
> this type of approach.

I would point again to my all my efforts over the past 1.5 year or so on 
getting the quality of the CDK to meet some standards. This is well worked 
out for quite some time.

If interested, please read up in the email archives on how CDK ensures its 
library quality. And yes, I can use some more people to work with me to cover 
more than just the data and core modules.

My QA team proposal has more to do with practical testing of classes, and has 
little to do with JavaDoc and source code quality... At least to start with; 
if that team wants to pick up my previous work, I would be the last to 
object...

Egon

-- 
eg...@us...
GPG: 1024D/D6336BA6