From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-03-27 14:13:39
|
Bugs item #710695, was opened at 2003-03-27 13:51 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=120024&aid=710695&group_id=20024 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Kai Hartmann (kaihartmann) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Inconsistent get methods in AtomContainer.java Initial Comment: Not a real bug, but a little inconsistency concerning the method names in the AtomContainer class: getHighestCurrentBondOrder getMinimumBondOrder In my opinion, the first method should be named getMaximumBondOrder to keep the names easy to remember and consistent. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Egon Willighagen (egonw) Date: 2003-03-27 15:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=25678 I prefer the getMaximum/MinimumBondOrder naming scheme Kai suggested. The getHighestCurrentBondOrder would be deprecated. But since we don't have officially released a stable release, what's the use of having deprecated methods? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Christoph Steinbeck (steinbeck) Date: 2003-03-27 14:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=54358 As Kai suggested in a personal communication, the old method should first be kept but deprecated and a new method with a better name should be added. What do we want to keep? The "current" version or the other? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=120024&aid=710695&group_id=20024 |