From: Egon W. <ego...@gm...> - 2014-01-20 16:50:33
|
John, Gillieain, others, On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:20 PM, gilleain torrance <gil...@gm...> wrote: > Regarding the names and assignment of modules to 'supermodules' : I'm happy with where this discussion is leading too; I don't have strong opinions here (for once :) > * storage - quite like that name actually. Could have a db package in > there too! :) CDK used to have DB code, but that never really picked up... reason here is that there are many combinations possible; what format to store the chemical graph in, how to use fingerprints, what to have as extension/module/foo in the underlying database itself, etc... that is, there did not seem to be enough common DB ground and in the end the code was pulled... For the CDK, we have OrChem, AMBIT, and probably more... Grtz, Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Researcher Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286 |